Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Oddball / Re: Elegent Scroll Frame Skeleton Clock
« Last post by Kim on Today at 10:49:35 PM »
Nice to hear you got the lathe turning again!

But - are you sure those are scrolly circles?  They look more like circley scrolls to me... ::)

 :cheers: :popcorn:

Hmm... good point.  I'll have to ponder that one!  :Lol:

Kim
2
From Kits/Castings / Re: What's the 'Score'?
« Last post by redhouseluv on Today at 07:26:51 PM »
I'm a numbers man - so good its good that I have a target to aim for!  :ROFL:
3
From Kits/Castings / Re: What's the 'Score'?
« Last post by crueby on Today at 07:23:27 PM »
Enough practice  and no more mistakes. I figure another 300 years will get me close to there...
4
Hints, Tips & Tricks / Re: Piston fit with o rings
« Last post by crueby on Today at 07:21:42 PM »
For model pistons with rings, the compression of the ring that the charts give would be pretty snug, tight for an easy slide fit. Good starting point though!
5
Your Own Design / Re: Ohio Locomotive Crane
« Last post by crueby on Today at 07:19:28 PM »
Thanks  guys!


The original machine used sets of ramps on the clutch discs to push the one with the cones back and forth. Clever, but tough to reproduce small, so the acme rod was the next best thing.
6
From Kits/Castings / Re: What's the 'Score'?
« Last post by redhouseluv on Today at 07:07:18 PM »
Shoulder surgery this morning and surgeon recommended 'light activities' so no changing over lathe chucks or bench pressing rotary tables for a few days!  ;D

Made the valve glands as part of my recovery .....
7
Hints, Tips & Tricks / Re: Piston fit with o rings
« Last post by Vixen on Today at 06:32:56 PM »
Go and look up any chart for BS imperial O rings, the nominal sizes are all smaller than the actual cross section of the cord and have always been that way.



Thank you for the explanation Jason. I was not familiar with BS imperial O rings nominal sizes being smaller than the actual cross section of the cord. Something learned today.

Mike

8
Hints, Tips & Tricks / Re: Piston fit with o rings
« Last post by Jasonb on Today at 06:29:32 PM »
From ME Handbook
9
Hints, Tips & Tricks / Re: Piston fit with o rings
« Last post by Jasonb on Today at 06:25:17 PM »
Go and look up any chart for BS imperial O rings, the nominal sizes are all smaller than the actual cross section of the cord and have always been that way.

10
Hints, Tips & Tricks / Re: Piston fit with o rings
« Last post by Jasonb on Today at 06:07:42 PM »
Mike, an 1/8" nominal O ring as the OP says he has (BS210) actually has a Cross section of 0.139" so not too deep to give a little compression of the ring. These are the figures I use on both my IC and steam engines with Viton rings and are taken from Tubal Cain's "Model Engineers Handbook" and based on tests done by Arnold Throp. They can also be found in a Reeves paper catalogue

If it's good enough for those two then it's good enough for me :ThumbsUp:

These figures compress the o ring far less than what you will see in the manufacturer's data sheets but we are not trying to hold back several hundread PSI with the resulting high friction that amount of ring compression produces.

Like Crhis I typically use a smaller section ring for my steam engines around the 1" bore. For the many 24mm bore ones I go with metric 2.4mm actual cross section rings  I use a 2.3mm deep groove and those that have built to my published drawings have also found that works fine on both <5psi air for display as well as running on steam.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal