Author Topic: Possibility for ringless piston  (Read 3257 times)

Offline Kartagener

  • Jr. member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Possibility for ringless piston
« on: July 19, 2024, 11:29:37 AM »
Hi folks,

I am considering building my first model engine and would like to start slow. My current plan is to build a simple pneumatic model engine with a slide valve. Since I won't be running real steam, thermal expansion wouldn't be an issue. So is it feasible for a model to run without piston ring? (current plan is 1.2" or 3 cm diameter piston) I know sterling engines have fairly large gaps between piston and bore, but not sure if that could translate well here.

Any input appreciated!  :)

Online Jasonb

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10083
  • Surrey, UK
Re: Possibility for ringless piston
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2024, 12:10:49 PM »
No problem running on air like that, I leave the ring off most of my engines as I mostly just run on air for display.

The power piston is a close fit on sterling engines, the displacer piston has a gap.


Offline Kartagener

  • Jr. member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Possibility for ringless piston
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2024, 01:07:35 PM »
No problem running on air like that, I leave the ring off most of my engines as I mostly just run on air for display.

The power piston is a close fit on sterling engines, the displacer piston has a gap.

Thanks a lot! For my purpose would you say that 5 thou or 0.13 mm difference between bore & piston diameter would be a good enough fit?

Online Jasonb

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10083
  • Surrey, UK
Re: Possibility for ringless piston
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2024, 01:18:19 PM »
No you really want a lot closer than that, even with rings that is a lot more than I would allow. something like 0.001" or 0.02mm on that sort of diameter if you want to put  a number on it but I just do it by feel. You also want a good finish on the bore (this one was not the best)

Have a look at this video of the fit for the engineI just completed. The end of the cylinder is just being held on a flat surface, with the steam/air port uncovered the piston drops straight to the bottom. If I put my finger over the port it takes a long while to drop. No Piston ring and no oil to seal anything.

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp2Vrq1Ziw4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp2Vrq1Ziw4</a>

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIhDdFKNSzA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIhDdFKNSzA</a>

Offline Kartagener

  • Jr. member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Possibility for ringless piston
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2024, 08:59:58 AM »
No you really want a lot closer than that, even with rings that is a lot more than I would allow. something like 0.001" or 0.02mm on that sort of diameter if you want to put  a number on it but I just do it by feel. You also want a good finish on the bore (this one was not the best)

Have a look at this video of the fit for the engineI just completed. The end of the cylinder is just being held on a flat surface, with the steam/air port uncovered the piston drops straight to the bottom. If I put my finger over the port it takes a long while to drop. No Piston ring and no oil to seal anything.

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp2Vrq1Ziw4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp2Vrq1Ziw4</a>

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIhDdFKNSzA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIhDdFKNSzA</a>

Thanks! What a beautiful little engine!

 

SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal