Author Topic: 'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons  (Read 840 times)

Offline tangler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
  • Christchurch, UK
'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons
« on: February 02, 2021, 07:23:21 PM »
Hi Folks,

I would appreciate your advice on the size of the groove for an elastomer piston ring on the Farm Boy engine.  Jerry specified a 3/32" (0.094") section 1" OD ring in a 0.105" wide groove 0.110" deep.  I've drawn this up, together with the sizes recommended by Tubal Cain in his Model Engineer's Handbook:




Looking at the sketch it seems that Jerry's design is completely unconstrained by the groove in the piston.  The ring is 1" OD as is the bore of the cylinder.  In Tubal Cain's design the ring is slightly compressed (pinched) by being in a groove that is slightly shallower than the ring section and has room to expand sideways when squeezed by insertion into  the bore.

Clearly many Farm Boys have been succesfully made and run so: any comments?

TIA,

Rod

Offline Jasonb

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8055
  • Surrey, UK
Re: 'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2021, 07:27:56 PM »
All the ones I have fitted have been done to the charts in TC's ME handbook and they give good compression and minimal drag. I use a brake cylinder hone on the bores.

Though the table gives 0.125wide x 0.098 deep on a 3/32" nominal which is 0.103" actual
J
« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 07:35:34 PM by Jasonb »

Offline Brian Rupnow

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6625
  • Barrie, Ontario Canada
Re: 'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2021, 11:11:09 PM »
I use Viton o-rings with a "nominal" cross section diameter of 1/16". They actually measure 0.070". I make my groove on the piston 0.094" wide (Parting off tool) x 0.058" deep. Only one ring is required on the piston. I have many engines running this way, both i.c. and steam and they work fine.

Offline gbritnell

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2347
Re: 'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2021, 06:05:16 PM »
I'm not a fan of O rings but I would go with Jerry Howell's idea. My reasoning is to let the O ring do the sealing without adding any pressure to it. If a 3/32 (nominal) ring is actually .101 (that's what my rings measure) then only going .092 deep would mean that the ring would be compressing .009 plus .001 (cylinder bore .998) or .010. To me that seems like an excessive amount of compression when only a few thousands will do the job. You have to understand that it's not just .010 at one point it's all the way around the 1.00 dia. bore. That's a lot of stiction!
gbritnell
Talent unshared is talent wasted.

Offline Zephyrin

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 566
  • near Paris, France
Re: 'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2021, 11:30:36 AM »
I do have made an engine with an O-ring at the piston, only once; when cold this engine doesn't have any compression, nothing, and after a few minutes of startup, the compression comes back, and the engine starts. This behaviour is really confusing, all my other engines (about 10) have one or 2 cast iron segments, or no segment at all for smaller diameters.

this point suggested to me that the section of O-rings are not constant, and may grow up with fuel, oil and heat. 
« Last Edit: February 04, 2021, 11:35:37 AM by Zephyrin »

Offline Bobsmodels

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
Re: 'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2021, 01:37:43 AM »
Hi

I have used o rings.   You want very little wall pressure.   The fly wheels should bounce no different than broke in iron rings.  No noticeable drag or friction.  Here is my Gade with around 600 or more hours on it with the original vitron o ring.



I have a little write-up on  o ring in this PDF, info is for Gade but calculation is generic. 

Bob

Offline tangler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
  • Christchurch, UK
Re: 'O' rings for i.c. engine pistons
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2021, 04:32:27 PM »
Guys,

Many thanks for your thoughts and experiences.  I think it is fairly clear that O rings are very forgiving, at least for initial running.  Longevity may be a different issue.  The O rings I have are 1/8" section Viton which are probably too thick for a 1" bore.  Bearing that in mind I am going for a groove without pinch so that it is only the compliance in the free ring that provides the fit.  In the final analysis, of course, it is no big deal to make another piston with different ring arrangements if necessary.

Once again, thanks.
Rod