Welcome to ModelEngineMaker !If you have problems registering or logging in, please use the contact menu option to request assistance.
My understanding of dished wheels was it allowed two things. As the rim was shrunk on, it would suck the fellows and the spokes in tight to the hub. Once they became end bound having the iron rim pull it tighter to more or less dish provided a bit of a safety valve if you did not get your shrinkage measurements just right. More importantly the dish was there to keep the load off the wheel bearing nut. Or in the case of more primitive examples, the washer and pin. The conical ends of the axle were bent downward, so the bottom profile of the stub axle was parallel to the ground. The wheels were canted outward. The dish matched the angle of the axles, so that on the lower portion of the wheel the load past directly vertical up the spokes to the hub. This did not generate any axial load. The upper portion of the wheel was canted outward due to the dish, which gave a bonus of extra clearance with the body. If the cone of the stub axle were horizontal, the weight of the carriage would constantly try to force the wheels out and off the ends of the axle, putting extra load on whatever retained the wheel on the bearing. At some point I suppose with a very heavy artillery type wheel, dish became impractical or of little value. Also with Savin patent iron hubs with ball or roller bearings, the retaining nut became substantial enough that having it under axial load all the time (as in autos) was not so much of a issue anymore. There may have been geometry reason that they wanted to keep the axle spindles horizontal as speeds increased and the design modernized. Not that a horse drawn steam pumper is going to break the speed limit, but horse drawn and early autos were cross-sharing a lot of chassis development ideas. -Doug