Welcome to ModelEngineMaker !If you have problems registering or logging in, please use the contact menu option to request assistance.
Quote from: Brian Rupnow on May 27, 2016, 06:11:39 PMIn regards to the chuck vibration---I did as someone had suggested and put a piece of 3/4" round in the chuck, and drilled and countersunk it to accept the nose of a "live center" held in the tailstock. I set various and different preloads on the live-center to see what effect that would have on the spindle bearings. It made no difference. I still get the vibration at approximately 600 rpm. I conclude from that test that the spindle bearings are set properly and need no adjustment. If they had been loose, the application of different loads from the live center would have had some effect on the vibration.Did you try taking the motor drive belt off to see if it was the motor itself?
In regards to the chuck vibration---I did as someone had suggested and put a piece of 3/4" round in the chuck, and drilled and countersunk it to accept the nose of a "live center" held in the tailstock. I set various and different preloads on the live-center to see what effect that would have on the spindle bearings. It made no difference. I still get the vibration at approximately 600 rpm. I conclude from that test that the spindle bearings are set properly and need no adjustment. If they had been loose, the application of different loads from the live center would have had some effect on the vibration.
My thoughts are that if your bearings are loose enough to cause vibration in your machine; the surface finish of your turned parts would look like crap.Has anyone considered this?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_speedDave
Or a flaw in the belt maybe?
Quote from: Dave Otto on May 28, 2016, 01:13:22 AMMy thoughts are that if your bearings are loose enough to cause vibration in your machine; the surface finish of your turned parts would look like crap.Has anyone considered this?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_speedDaveAgreed on the finish comment. Although the phenomenon was not properly named, I believe that theory is the current assumption.