Author Topic: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles  (Read 12757 times)

Offline RolandMM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42
  • Curmudgeon
"We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« on: March 12, 2015, 05:28:26 PM »
"Oh sure, we can build that."

I was pretty sure Marvin did not have a mouse in his pocket so that meant the  "WE" in "WE can build that" meant Roland & Marvin.  The overworked, behind schedule, overbooked and exhausted team of Morrison & Marvin Engine Works now had a new project.

The "THAT" I understood perfectly. Of course Marvin was correct, we could build the engine, but years ago I had declined this incredibly interesting project because time & resources are finite and I already had enough projects lined up for 3 lifetimes.

We were in a building full of one of a kind California built engines.  A longtime California Engine Collector has amassed parts and pieces of countless engines and made the missing parts to restore many.  He is a good patternmaker and works well with George at the Silverton Foundry and years ago he decided there needed to be a special model engine.  One that showed the best features of a particular early manufacturer.

Features that showed unique design like curved spoke flywheels, horizontal governor, top exhaust and vertical side shaft.

Please understand I am over the age of 12 and therefore cannot think in Binary.  I grew up in America when it was a free country.  The cars were made of steel and had engines that roared. The cup holder set close to the driver and wore a miniskirt. I consider the computer and cell phone to be a problem not a solution.

I am barely able to write a draft in MS Word and put in pictures where appropriate but the pictures will not copy to MEM.  The way around this is more complex than I  care to deal with so I will try writing until there should be a picture, inserting the picture and continuing another day
.

Here is a picture of the castings sitting on my stainless steel fab table.

Roland
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Offline Alan Haisley

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 693
  • Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina, USA
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2015, 07:49:08 PM »
Any way that tells the story works for me.  :popcorn:

Alan

Offline Dave Otto

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4709
  • Boise, Idaho USA
    • Photo Bucket
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2015, 12:00:44 AM »
Hi Roland

You are doing fine; putting my thoughts into words is something that I always struggle with.

Looking forward to hearing more about this interesting one of a kind project; more pictures too!

Keep on posting.

Dave

Offline tvoght

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1003
  • Indiana
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2015, 02:23:17 PM »
Roland,
  I enjoy your writing style and look forward to updates on what appears to be a very interesting project.

--Tim

Offline RolandMM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42
  • Curmudgeon
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2015, 06:46:25 PM »
Alan, Dave & Tim, thank you for your kind words.  All my engines have a story and it is an integral part of the engine. How can you appreciate something when you don't understand why it is there?

An early​ California Engine, the Regan Engine, was made in San Francisco, California in 1879 to power sewing machines.  What made his engine so great is Daniel Regan invented and patented, in 1884, the "Make and Break" ignitor which became the most popular type of engine ignition for many years. In 1889 The Regan Vapor Engine Company was incorporated to manufacturer Regan Vapor Engines and Vapor Engine Launches.

In 1889, Daly, Cavanagh & Barrett organized  the Pacific Gas or Gasoline Engine Company for the purpose of manufacturing Pacific Engines.   Regan sued because some of the features were also on the Regan Engines under his patents.

After many long court battles and appeals with both sides winning and losing, the companys were unable to continue so the parties involved agreed to join companies and build engines together.  The name of this company, founded on May 16, 1892 was UNION Gas Engine Company.

The WHAT was a 7/16 scale set of castings based on a 1901 Union but with features from earlier engines.

There were 3 sets of castings, one which had been partially machined.  No plans, no dimensions, and hardest of all, no actual engine to measure. In fact, as this was the combination of several engines, no pictures exist because this engine didn't exist.

No problem, impossible things just take a little longer.  We understand engines and of course we can build a running model from these castings.  But why just build an engine?  It is only twice as much work to make an exact replica which was the original intent.

Union engines are exceedingly rare, especially the early ones.  Most are quite far away in the foreign country of California. (If you disagree, explain why I must go through Customs and Immigration when I arrive from Oregon, Nevada or Arizona!)

Marvin and I had just returned from the "California Gold" Show (you must bring a California built engine for admittance) where there were prime examples of Union Engines.  However at that time WE did not know about THAT new project.  Had we known, we would have taken countless pictures and measurements.

We borrowed a 1905 Union catalog which shows a later model engine.  It showed some details we needed and we called Union owners for pictures from other angles. We were able to borrow some parts which were applicable to our model.  Nothing beats a "hard drawing".

I will attach the picture for each of you to study as we build the engine.

Roland

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Offline RolandMM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42
  • Curmudgeon
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2015, 03:55:30 PM »
The first thing Marvin & I do when starting a new engine is to define the project.  This requires a parts list developed from various pictures and knowledge of how these old engines were built. Parts lists are available for many common engines which can be a starting point but usually the engines we build have very little literature still existing.

Then​ we studied the castings.  I quickly decided that Marvin should take the heads home with him.  We had been told the cores were different in each head and it turned out none of the coring worked.

Parts with long leadtimes were dealt with first.  I had no material the correct size so I made a split pattern for a billet we would need for the cylinder sleeves and took it to George at the Silverton Foundry to be cast in iron.  I did not take many pictures of the pattern so let me explain the fine points so when you need a billet it will be easy.

Greensand foundrys are happy with a matchplate that fits their flasks.  However unless there is a quantity to cast or it is a complex part, a split pattern will suffice.  Some foundrys will work with a solid pattern but for a simple billet a split pattern is easy to make.

Start with a piece of clear grained wood, plane two faces so they are flat. Then drill a blind dowel hole close to each end.  Make one 1/2" and the other 5/8" diameter.  Drill matching blind holes on the other piece.  Then glue dowels into one side and fit the other on it tightly.  The reason for different size dowels is to make it a challenge for foundry workers to put it together backwards.

Put a hose clamp around it and make a shoulder for machining the pattern and also when you machine the billet it is a good place to grab so you can machine the whole piece in one pass.  Note in the picture I protect my lathe from wood dust with papers.

Foundrys have stock sand cores but usually they are more a problem than just drilling the hole later.

I found a few pictures of the sleeve and rough machining it.  The lathe has a 4" spindle hole so it is easy to center drill both ends and true up the shoulder. Then chuck the billet on the shoulder, support with a center in the tailstock and take off the scale .

Then I chucked it and rough drilled the cylinder bore. Drilling with a 1-1/2" drill bit is quick because the tailstock attaches to the carriage for power feed.

Roland
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Offline sshire

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3044
    • LS Editions
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2015, 04:26:04 PM »
Roland
Your process is absolutely fascinating. Looking forward to the rest of the adventure.
Best,
Stan

Offline metalmad

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 687
  • Australia Skype - metalmad11
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2015, 07:21:03 PM »
Hi Roland
I'm looking forward to this one :ThumbsUp:
Pete
A little bit every day, sometimes the same little bit

Offline RolandMM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42
  • Curmudgeon
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2015, 04:05:26 PM »
Building a model engine requires a few deviations from a real engine.  The cooling water passages in the cylinder doesn't scale well.  New technology may be able to do it but for practical purposes we do not attempt to cast water jackets in place.

The practical way around this is to sleeve the cylinders after relieving an area for the water passage.

On the Union Engine the sleeve was so thick I decided to make the cooling water cavity in the sleeve.

After being drilled on a larger lathe I chucked the sleeve in a precision lathe to bore it and machine to size.

I purposely made the sleeve 1" too long.  This acted as a chucking lug for machining and assembly.

First I bored the sleeve to within .050 of finished diameter.  Then careful measurement of the cylinder bore was taken. The object is to get a tight fit between the cylinder and the sleeve.

Roland
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Offline Dave Otto

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4709
  • Boise, Idaho USA
    • Photo Bucket
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2015, 12:31:08 AM »
Hi Roland

I have been enjoying your Union story and the construction of this interesting early CA engine. The Regan, Pacific, Union history has probably got to be right up there as one of the most interesting in the US internal combustion engine development.

Please keep posting more progress photos as they become available; it will be wonderful to see this rusty pile of castings become a beautiful running example of our early engine pioneer's work.

Dave

Offline smfr

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • San Francisco Bay Area, California
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2015, 03:58:29 AM »
This is shaping up to be a fascinating story, and I'll be following along, Roland.

Thanks for posting!
Simon

Offline RolandMM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42
  • Curmudgeon
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2015, 05:57:22 AM »
Simon & Dave, Thank you for your interest.  The world has no idea of the variety of engines developed and manufactured in California in the 19th century.  Besides the Regan, Pacific & Union there was the Garratt, the Oriental which later became the Corliss Gas Engine Company and the Hercules (not the common Hercules).  Then there was Adam Schilling & Sons which morphed into The Golden Gate Engine Company.  Even Syranus Standish built engines as did Daly & Cavanagh of the Fremont Iron Works.

Most California built engines are old and all of them are rare.

On with our Union model now;
Before assembling the sleeve into the cylinder there was some work to do on the casting.  I don't have pictures of the cylinder machining but I did find one showing how I drilled the passages needed.  The cooling water inlet is on the side of the cylinder and exits through the head.

Union engines had a pre-heater for the air.  This was typical of early California  engines with just slight differences, The Pacific had a diamond pattern of small holes for air inlet but the Union has a round hole cast opposite the boss for the mixer so the air traveled around the cylinder, in a passage similar to a water jacket.

All these holes go only through the cylinder wall so it made sense to drill them before inserting the sleeve.

I set up the cylinder on an angle plate squared with the table.  Height at this point didn't matter so I used some firewood to support the casting and held it in place with a couple bolts.  As the top of the casting was machined square with the bore, everything was true except with the mounting flange holes.

This was easily solved using an apprentice pipefitter technique of "two-holing".  Simply put 2 cylinder support columns in the top holes and level with a Starrett 98.

Then find center from the machined flange at the top of the cylinder and you know exactly where you are and everything is true.

To finish, I machined the mixer boss flat and drilled the holes.  Oiler holes in the bosses on the side need to go through the sleeve also so will be drilled later on a similar setup except a square will be put against the vertical mixer boss to make the holes at right angles.

Roland

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Offline RolandMM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42
  • Curmudgeon
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2015, 09:29:44 PM »
Now that the cylinder casting has been machined as far as possible at this stage and the sleeve has been bored to within .050 of the finished bore (1.7500) it is time to consider assembly.

Careful measurements of the casting bore were made so the outside of the sleeve could be turned to fit.

After reading on this forum, I understand several inexperienced machinists are eager to learn what to do and especially what not to do. For them I will explain more than I know about fitting sleeves.

I know splendid model builders who use Loctite to hold a sleeve in a cylinder and it is quite successful.

I was an apprentice boy when a Loctite salesman showed up and told us how revolutionary his new product was.  I remember him saying someday it would even replace arc welding.  We all got a free sample and tried it and weren't impressed. It is probably much better now and I have used the hydraulic sealant with success but I am not one to put things together with hot glue and dryer lint.

I feel a sleeve in a cylinder should be an interference fit.

There are 2 kinds of interference fits: press and shrink. I like shrink fits because they are so simple and effective. The same interference with a shrink fit is 1-1/2 times stronger than a press fit.  Not as much chance of damaging a thin part and you don't need a press.

Machinery's Handbook gives more details than you want to know but a FN1 fit is good for model engines. Too tight and something will crack. Too loose and the water will leak.

Shrink fits are used in industry.  My largest shrink fit experience was on a liquid sodium pump coupling. The shaft was about 10" diameter and the coupling hung from a chainfall.  The interference was .0080 and 4 rosebuds heated the coupling for about an hour being very careful to equalize the heat.  When the tempstick showed the correct heat the coupling was lowered down to the stop clamped onto the shaft and left overnight.  The next day the coupling was connected and the shrink fit, without a key in the shaft, handled the 2500 horsepower from the motor.

Another time I watched a factory rep shrink a gear on a shaft.  It was a timing gear on a 2000 horsepower emergency diesel.  Because of the heat treating in both parts the gear was only heated in boiling water but the shaft end was cooled.  He used dry ice and alcohol which worked fine.  There was liquid nitrogen available in the plant but for some reason he chose not to use it. It is the difference in temperature that allows a shrink fit to be assembled.

Now back to the simpler job of shrinking a sleeve into a casting with a 2.6250 hole.

Those who know all about this can skip to the pictures;  the rest of you pay close attention because when you try this you only get one chance.

I wanted a .0030 interference but due to my lack of ability ended up with a .0035 interference.  Those of you who have tried to machine off .0005 know it will get away and pretty soon it will be a Loctite fit.

You can't test fit the pieces because they won't fit.  The best you can do is make sure there is no burr and break the edges so when you assemble the pieces they don't hang anywhere, because if they do, that is where it will stay.

I use the kitchen oven (stinks up the kitchen) and leave the piece in at least an hour to make sure it has expanded.  I used 450 degrees because it was a bit tighter than I planned.

During that time I fasten a stop to the sleeve so it could only go as far as it should.  This is a very important step!

Then I wrapped the casting in an old towel to keep it warm and hustled to the shop where the sleeve was still held in the chuck and slid it on.  Had some coffee and wrote a piece for Model Engine Maker bragging about what I had just accomplished while it cooled.

Roland

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Offline 90LX_Notch

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1614
  • North Eastern Pennsylvania USA
    • YouTube Channel
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #13 on: April 01, 2015, 12:01:47 AM »
Nice work with the shrink fit Roland.  This continues to be a great build.

-Bob
Proud Member of MEM

My Engine Videos on YouTube-
http://www.youtube.com/user/Notch90usa/videos

Offline Dave Otto

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4709
  • Boise, Idaho USA
    • Photo Bucket
Re: "We can build that!" The Union Chronicles
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2015, 01:25:56 AM »
There is always a bit of a pucker factor when assembling shrink fits, but is sure is nice when everything slides into place (maybe forever!).

Thanks for the update Roland.

Dave

 

SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal