Welcome to ModelEngineMaker !If you have problems registering or logging in, please use the contact menu option to request assistance.
Don, if the weather is a little nicer tomorrow I will go take some. The park is literally just across the road from me. I had not imagined there would be this much interest actually..lolBill
Anyway it went pretty well, we got the line shaft section that we wanted down (carefully) and then sawed the shaft in half to help load it onto the trailer. The shafting itself was of no interest and actually broke after sawing half way through. Here are a couple of pictures of the location and the line shaft loaded up. Bill
My pleasure Don and it was a beautiful morning here and nice to get out in the air for a bit. Being a city kid, I can't say I have ever picked cotton but certainly hear lots of stories from the old timers around here that did and most say it was back breaking work and very hard on the hands as well!! My early career was spent in the cotton mill though and I still love the smell of raw cotton.Bill
As used in this context, the word 'gin' is intriguing. I always thought that it was a simplification of 'engine' but Whitney's patent uses 'gin' in its title. I rather doubt that an abbreviation would be used in a document that formal.
...scenting the cotton with an organic compound that was not know to cause cancer in the Republic of California, just saying
Quote from: Tennessee Whiskey on November 04, 2014, 10:32:07 PM...scenting the cotton with an organic compound that was not know to cause cancer in the Republic of California, just saying There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that is not known to the Republik of Kalifornia to cause cancer. Every place one goes, restaurants, big box stores, super markets, one sees a mandatory Proposition 65 warning... It is known to the State of California, yada, yada...My suggestion to replace them all with the generic version...has, so far, gone unheeded by the liberals in Sacramento.I once parked in a parking structure that contained a sign warning that, at sometime in the past, the structure may have housed vehicles that emitted stuff known to the State of California, yada, yada. So even the past is not safe from our ever-vigilant, ever-laughable government. Retroactive finger wagging.My ultimate goal is to get some laboratory to prove that, in the event of fire, Proposition 65 signs emit gases known to.... Then we can force the state to put Proposition 65 warnings on their Proposition 65 warning signs. It would make my evil heart glow.