Author Topic: MEM_Corliss Yet another!  (Read 8644 times)

Offline Steam Haulage

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
  • Notts UK
MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« on: January 26, 2014, 01:23:39 PM »
Hi all, especially to everyone who inspired me to set out on this project. My thanks for the plans and build records, some of which are still going on, Arnold, Vince, Maryak, Capn Jerry, etc. And to everyone who chimed in with hints to the build logs.

Anyway I bought a chunk of CI for the flywheel from M-Machine, helpful as expected, with adequate sizes. My initial thoughts were to go larger than the plans, to give more weight to the rim.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2014, 01:28:18 PM by Steam Haulage »
Dogs look up to you, cats look down on you, pigs treat you as equal.

Online Jo

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15306
  • Hampshire, england.
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2014, 01:38:56 PM »
 8)

I'll be following along  ;)

Jo
Enjoyment is more important than achievement.

Offline Steam Haulage

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
  • Notts UK
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2014, 01:51:22 PM »
With one side roughly turned to work on the other.

You will see that I have used fairly chunky tools with carbide inserts. Some will know that I had asked for advice about these but probably inevitably there seemed to be two opposing camps which pulled me in different directions. :headscratch:
So I consulted some professionals I know who all came down on the side of indexable tooling. Having always thought since re-entering the hobby that modernisation should be my watchword. Since my first entry in the 80s nothing in the UK seemed to have moved.  I spoke to a supplier in Glasgow who gave me some firm recommendations on using Kennametal kit.

So far I have not regretted choosing to use his advice. Anyway I have rough turned both sides and the rim using only one edge of each tip, i.e. one LH and one RH. Obviously I shall have to change around each to get a good finish. Although the holders were certainly expensive they are also rigid. Inserts in the less than £10 bracket is just a running cost I am prepared to bear as each has 4 tips and they take a good bashing. You can see the cut is interrupted.
Only time will tell.

Jerry
Dogs look up to you, cats look down on you, pigs treat you as equal.

Offline Bezalel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 376
  • - Skype:Bezalel2000
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2014, 01:57:23 PM »
Thats a nice chunk of iron there Jerry,
 
I'm loking forward to seeing a corliss attached to it.
 
I'll be following.
 
Bez
Queensland - wet one day, humid the next

Offline tvoght

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1003
  • Indiana
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2014, 02:14:38 PM »
A good start!. I'll be watching.

--Tim

Offline vcutajar

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2555
  • Marsascala, MALTA
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2014, 02:29:56 PM »
Goody. Another Corliss. :cartwheel:

Jerry, I pulled up a chair and popcorn.

Did you have a change of heart?  You were going to use the faceplate and then decided to use a chuck.

Keep it up.

Vince

Offline Alan Haisley

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 693
  • Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina, USA
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2014, 06:58:02 PM »
Another Corless to watch.

:bandrock:

Alan

Offline Steam Haulage

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
  • Notts UK
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2014, 07:11:17 PM »
Vince,

Yes I did change my mind but not in the way you might at first think. I thought long and hard about the modifications I might make; have adopted metric, by converting everything in AutoCAD from the original TC plans then adopting metric 'preferred' sizes. Most of them seem to be able to furnish a size near as damitt to the original imperial so that I (at this stage hopefully) can use those wherever it seems judicious, so that the crankshaft will end up reamed to 10mm rather than 9.525mm / 0.375". Of course I may have to think again about bearings, I hope I can turn/ream them to suit the final size.

Any way to return to the flywheel: my faceplate, as you saw comfortably took the original 220mm diam piece, then I thought I would be making made enough adaptation to the MEM drawings, which obviously are the result of a lot of thought, without seeing what happens if I keep to the plans, so I set too and turned the OD back to 184mm on the faceplate. My 4-jaw has about 200mm capacity so I set it up in that and continued the roughing. The lathe has plenty of power but my shop vac bag was almost too heavy and tightly packed to lift out of the drum when I wheelie binned it this evening.

Assuming I can get this total build finished I will think about a repeat using the larger diameter. I already have some CI tube of that diameter and some MS tube and these I will turn to be an interference fit to try making the flywheel as a composite :insane:

I'll have to get back to work this week, hopefully more next weekend.

Thanks to all for following.

Jerry

Dogs look up to you, cats look down on you, pigs treat you as equal.

Offline b.lindsey

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13860
  • Dallas, NC, USA
    • Workbench-Miniatures
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #8 on: January 26, 2014, 07:14:12 PM »
Following along here as well Jerry. Your are already off to a good start.

Bill

Offline Maryak

  • Rest In Peace
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1818
  • Aldinga Beach South Australia
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2014, 02:17:17 AM »
Hi Jerry,

Maybe Arnold can confirm but IIRC a set of metric plans was provided using 24mm = 1 inch as the conversion.

If they were not published, I think I have a set somewhere here to the above scale.

Best Regards
Bob
Если вы у Тетушки были яйца, она была бы Дядюшкой

Offline arnoldb

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1341
  • Windhoek, Namibia
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2014, 06:10:35 AM »
Hi Jerry - good to see a start on another one  :ThumbsUp:

Bob's correct - he made a set of 24mm = 1" plans for metric use - that's how I built mine.

I'm at work now; if you can't find them, I'll upload them this evening.

Kind regards, Arnold
Building an engine takes Patience, Planning, Preparation and Machining.
Procrastination is nearly the same, but it precludes machining.
Thus, an engine will only be built once the procrastination stops and the machining begins!

Offline Steam Haulage

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
  • Notts UK
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2014, 07:56:01 AM »
Hi Arnold and Maryak,

I have those plans and have studied them for some time, however I made the decision to stick with 25.40 / inch. In ACAD it was simple to scale everything 1.0493 X, with a guessing stick and calculator and using metric measures, DRO, metric callipers and mike so far it seems as easy to measure to 0.001 mm as to 0.001".
The units are not my difficulty, it's my care and attention, I'm not as young as I was so working 5 full days plus machining at the weekend and grabbed minutes whenever possible only makes me look forward to retirement; and this will not happen until the EC commission gives up rushing out new regulations so frequently. :old:

Thank you both for the offer of the 25:1 plans, much appreciated anyway.

Jerry

Dogs look up to you, cats look down on you, pigs treat you as equal.

Offline Steam Haulage

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
  • Notts UK
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2014, 07:59:39 AM »
Arnold,

I should have given you due credit, I have followed you build from the very beginning, it's your flywheel I am plagiarising now.

Thanks for the inspiration. :cheers:

Jerry
Dogs look up to you, cats look down on you, pigs treat you as equal.

Offline arnoldb

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1341
  • Windhoek, Namibia
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2014, 05:47:59 PM »
Hi Jerry

I deserve none  :) - if you're making the flywheel from solid, it's Vince that deserves the credit  :ThumbsUp:

Kind regards, Arnold
Building an engine takes Patience, Planning, Preparation and Machining.
Procrastination is nearly the same, but it precludes machining.
Thus, an engine will only be built once the procrastination stops and the machining begins!

Offline Steam Haulage

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
  • Notts UK
Re: MEM_Corliss Yet another!
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2014, 07:31:13 PM »
Yes, I have followed both of your builds and mixed up the source of the flywheel 'process' in my mind so my plagiarism apologies should have gone to Vince. I hope he doesn't feel too offended by my slip-up.

Thanks for pointing out my c--k--p and giving me a chance to make a correction.

Jerry
Dogs look up to you, cats look down on you, pigs treat you as equal.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal